BULLETIN BOARD
To request an alternative accessible format of these documents, please contact MDT’s ADA Coordinator at 406-444-5416, Montana Relay Service at 711, or by email at mdtaccessibilityrequest@mt.gov.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The June 25,2026 Standard Specifications are now in effect. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS https://www.mdt.mt.gov/business/contracting/standard-specs.aspx.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Billings Bypass – Johnson Lane Interchange Extended Advertisement (UPDATED 6/1/26)
The BBP – Johnson Lane Interchange is an MDT project in Yellowstone County to reconstruct the Johnson Lane Interchange on Interstate 90. Advertisement for the project is scheduled to begin on July 16th, 2026 running through August 27th, 2026. The Q&A Forum will be open for questions beginning on Thursday, July 16th and will close on Friday, August 21st at 8 am. The Preliminary Bid Package is available on the MDT Contracting & Bidding webpage at the following address: Preliminary-Copy-Proposal-and-Plans
The Q&A Forum period for all other projects in the August 27, 2026 letting will remain unchanged, with the Q&A Forum opening to questions beginning on July 30th and closing to questions on Monday, August 24th at 8 am.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ekalaka Exigency Project
MT-323 Culvert – S of Ekalaka is an exigency project to replace the failing 108-inch CSP culvert on MT 323 at R.P. 22.9. Due to the risk of failure of the pipe there is a severe threat to the integrity of the roadway and the safety of the travelling public. The project will be included in the scheduled August 6th, 2026 bid letting with advertising beginning on July 9th and award on August 18th. The Notice to Proceed will be expedited and is expected to be on or around August 31st, 2026.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Watch - Public Bid Opening - Live Stream: ZOOM MEETING INFORMATION
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Advertised Projects: If you would like to receive the Invitation for Bids PDF document when projects are advertised, please send an email request to mdtcps@mt.gov. Follow the link for more information: EMAIL DISTRIBUTION
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
301 - NEVI PROGRAM - INTERSTATE SYSTEM - July 29, 2026
Notifications
-1-
Submitted: Wednesday 18-MAR-2026 11:00 AM
The Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) is soliciting design and construction services for the Design-Build project identified below. Contractor and consultant teams (Firms) are encouraged to submit a Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) response electronically by 11:00 a.m., local time on April 7, 2026.
Project Name: NEVI Program- Interstate System
Project No: EV STWD(983)
Control No: 10436000
Project Description:
The Project consists of performing all services necessary to design, construct, operate, and maintain EV charging stations in compliance with the requirements described in the draft Contract included as Attachment 2. The EV charging stations will be located along Montana’s AFCs at locations to be determined by Proposers as described in the draft RFP included as Attachment 1. The work generally includes the following:
• Design and construct a minimum of four network-connected direct current (DC) 150 kilowatt (kW) charging ports, at each EV charging station, capable of simultaneously and continuously charging four EVs, located within approximately a one-mile driving distance of an AFC, and available for use by the public 24 hours per day, seven days per week, and year-round.
• Operate and maintain the EV charging infrastructure for a minimum of five years following EVSE Acceptance pursuant to Section 4.6.4 (EVSE Acceptance) of the Contract in accordance with the O&M Period requirements.
• Provide secure payment methods.
• Collect, process, retain, and share near real-time and static data.
• Provide a minimum of 20 percent of Eligible Project Cost.
The project RFQ and attachments can be found at the following link: RFQ-ATTACHMENTS
-2-
Submitted: Monday 23-MAR-2026 11:36 AM
MDT is hosting an SOQ Webinar at 11:00 am Mountain Time on March 25, 2026, to highlight important components of the RFQ. This informational webinar is open to the public with microphone and video disabled. All questions should be asked through the Q&A Forum in accordance with the RFQ and no questions will be answered during the webinar.
Topic: MDT SOQ Webinar
Time: Mar 25, 2026 11:00 AM Mountain Time (US and Canada)
Join Zoom Meeting
https://mt-gov.zoom.us/j/86089197890?pwd=3zMC8YUcouEzfTThbQAWgacDDVV5lS.1
Meeting ID: 860 8919 7890
Password: 590639
Dial by Telephone
+1 646 558 8656
Meeting ID: 860 8919 7890
Password: 590639
Find your local number: https://mt-gov.zoom.us/u/kbzpCWQBMV
-3-
Submitted: Wednesday 25-MAR-2026 08:35AM
Update to the Personnel Experience Section 3.4 of the RFQ:
The Personnel Experience portion of the SOQ shall not exceed 16, 8.5”x11” pages (two pages maximum for each of the eight resumes). Personnel Experience is a scored element with a scoring total score of 300 points.
-4-
Submitted: Thursday 26-MAR-2026 07:36 AM
NEVI Program SOQ PowerPoint and Webinar: NEVI SOQ
-5-
Submitted: Tuesday 14-APR-2026 11:40 AM
In lieu of the email mdtalternativecontracting@mt.gov provided in Section 2.3: SOQ Submittal of the RFQ, please submit SOQ’s through the file transfer service to Eric Parrish at eparrish@mt.gov and Aubrey Yerger at ayerger@mt.gov. The email (mdtalternativecontracting@mt.gov) appears to be invalid when used with the state file transfer service.
-6-
Submitted: Wednesday 13-MAY-2026 11:13 AM
Shortlisted Firms ( In alphabetical order):
EV Gateway
FTI & SWTCH
Love’s Travel Stops
-7-
Submitted: Thursday 04-JUN-2026 12:23PM
The following attachments to the RFP have had issues opening properly:
- 10436_02_A1_1B_HazMat.pdf
- 10436_02_A1_1C_CatEx.pdf
Working files can be found here: RFP Attachments Working
It should be noted that the files will not open properly in the Microsoft Explorer or Google Chrome Browsers. You will need to right click and force them to be opened with Adobe Acrobat.
Amendments
No Amendments available for this project.
Clarifications
-1-
Submitted: Thursday 26-MAR-2026 11:38AM
The SOQ submittal date posted to the Q&A forum is hereby amended to April 15th at 11:00 a.m. local time to align with the procurement schedule in the RFQ.
-2-
Submitted: Tuesday 07-APR-2026 11:56AM
The Preproposal meeting has been rescheduled for Tuesday, May 26th, 2026, from 12:30 PM to 1:30 PM local time.
-3-
Submitted: Friday 10-APR-2026 08:34AM
The introduction (Page 1, Paragraph 3) of the RFQ is hereby modified as follows:
“Proposers may elect to pursue one, multiple, or all a minimum of three EV charging stations identified in the subsequent Request for Proposals (RFP). Following evaluation of the Statement of Qualifications (SOQs), MDT will identify a shortlist of Proposers that will receive an RFP and may submit a Proposal to MDT. After evaluation of Proposals, Montana Transportation Commission (MTC) will select one NEVI Contractor, and MDT will enter into one three or more EV charging station-specific agreements with the NEVI Contractor. “
-4-
Submitted: Thursday 23-APR-2026 09:16 AM
In support of Q&A clarification #3 the following definition applies:
In accordance with 23 CFR 680.104, EV charging station means the area in the immediate vicinity of a group of chargers and includes the chargers, supporting equipment, parking areas adjacent to the chargers, and lanes for vehicle ingress and egress. A charging station could comprise only part of the property on which it is located.
-5-
Submitted: Thursday 28-MAY-2026 12:35 PM
The following edits are to section 3 Proposal Content Requirements, subsection 3.3 Price Proposal of the RFP:
- Proposer shall enter the NEVI Contractor
ShareContribution (%$) for each EV charging station. The NEVI Contractor Share (%) will be automatically calculated. This percentage must be 20% or higher. - Federal Share of Eligible Costs must not exceed $800,000 for each EV charging station.
- All percentages must be
Share of Eligible Costswhole numbers.
-6-
Submitted: Monday 01-JUN-2026 10:52 AM
The Q&A Forum close date is amended in section 2, subsection 2.2 - Procurement Schedule of the RFP as follows:
| Q&A Forum Closes at 5:00 p.m. local time |
-7-
Submitted: Thursday 18-JUN-2026 08:25 AM
Section 2.5.2 Price Proposal Submittal (Page 5, Paragraph 3) is hereby modified as follows:
Additionally, the Proposer shall submit a Proposal Guaranty in an amount not less than 10% of the price proposed in the Proposer’s Price Proposal.Total Project. Cost Proposal shall accompany each Proposer’s Total Project Cost Proposal. The Proposal Guaranty shall must accompany the Proposer’s Price Proposal and be in the form of a surety bond, payable to MDT. The surety issuing the Proposal Guaranty on any proposal bond shall be a company recognized authorized to execute bid bonds for contracts of the Federal Government. The Proposal Guaranty shall secure the stand for the Proposer’s obligation to timely and properly satisfy all conditions precedent to execution of the Contract and execute the Contract.
Questions
-1-
Submitted: Thursday 19-MAR-2026 09:18 AM
Company: MN8 Energy
Contact: Brianna Alix
Within the RFQ, it is outlined that there will be an SOQ webinar held on 3/25. Could you please share how we should register for the session?
Answer
Submitted: Monday 23-MAR-2026 11:29 AM
MDT will post the SOQ webinar information as a notification to the Q&A Forum.
-2-
Submitted: Monday 30-MAR-2026 12:59 PM
Company: Voltpost
Contact: Olivia Cosio
Is MDT only interested in DCFC along AFCs? Can these federal funds also go towards Level 2 chargers at the zones outlined in the RFP?
Answer
Submitted: Wednesday 01-APR-2026 08:25 AM
This project will not offer funding for AC level 2 charging ports.
-3-
Submitted: Wednesday 01-APR-2026 08:31 AM
Company: Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores Inc
Contact: Paris Despenza
1. Does the applicant have to apply under joint venture if the EVSE provider is a contractor on the project? Or can we just provide the letter of commitments for them?
2. Can we include cover pages? If so, does that count towards the max page amount limit?
3. Does the percentage of their contributions on a project have to be on the key personnel resume?
4. Do we have to register prior to submission of the SOQ?
5. Does the form have to stay within their individual page limit? For example, if form a is 1 pg, form b is 3pgs, form c is 1 pg, not exceeding 5pgs in total does that suffice?
Answer
Submitted: Thursday 2-APR-2026 03:29PM
1. No, Proposer does not have to propose as a JV. The Proposer can propose as a single entity led by a prime with subcontractors or a JV. If the Proposer intends to form a JV, but has not yet done so, the Proposer can provide a signed letter of intent or teaming agreement stating intent to form a JV if awarded.
2. A cover page may be included for the whole proposal and a cover page to separate each section outlined in the RFQ. These sheets will not count towards the max page limit.
3. No, the percentage contribution/time spent on a particular project doesn’t specifically need to be included on the key personnel resume.
4. Per section 3.4 of the RFQ,"the EVSE Contractor and any other team memeber that will perform construction or installation is required to be a licensed contractor in the state of Montana prior to the execution of the Contract."
5. The Max Pages in scoring table 4.2.1 should be followed for page limits. Each form and section should not exceed the designated page limits.
-4-
Submitted: Monday 13-APR-2026 03:46 PM
Company: Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores Inc
Contact: Paris Despenza
Per the RFQ it states to send the submission to mdtalternativecontracting@mt.gov. However, it states that email is invalid and gives an error. If the submission is sent to the two contacts listed in the RFQ Eric Parrish and Aubrey Yerger, is the submission considered valid and properly submitted?
Answer
Submitted: Tuesday 14-APR-2026 07:17 AM
Yes, the submission received via email to Eric Parrish (eparrish@mt.gov) and Aubrey Yerger (ayerger@mt.gov) is considered valid.
-5-
Submitted: Tuesday 14-APR-2026 07:46 AM
Company: Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores Inc
Contact: Paris Despenza
Are applicants required to acknowledge the clarifications?
Answer
Submitted: Wednesday 15-APR-2026 03:17 PM
Clarifications are considered to be part of the Q&A. Therefore, acknowledgement of the Q&A, as indicated in Section 3.2.1 of the RFQ, is acknowledgement of the clarifications.
-6-
Submitted: Tuesday 16-JUN-2026 09:45 AM
Company: Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc
Contact: Paris Despenza
1. In reference to 2.5.2 it states we shall provide surety bond guaranty not less than 10% of the total project amount and that it shall accompany each proposer total project cost proposal. Is that being submitted through bidexpress with the price form or attached to the tech proposal? Will we need a surety bond per station?
2. In reference to 3.1, we are required to submit the notarized statement from an admitted surety to identify proposers with available bonding capacity. Is this different than the surety bond guaranty we have to submit with the Admin proposal? Please clarify.
3. For the Environmental NEPA evaluation, is the NEPA forms consist of 1A-1D during application process? Some of the questions from the HAZMAT and CATEX looks repetive for to 1A and 1D. Please provide clarity which forms are needed to be filled out during application process. If so for the HAZMAT and CATEX, it ask for control number, project number, project name, where do we find that information? Are we needing to send these forms to an specific consultant?
4. In addition to form 1B, it asks for UPN, design lead etc. Where do we get that information? Also are we required to attach photos? If so what type of photos?
5. For the American Land Form, are we required to provide the utility correspondence, deed along with site host letter? Or is any of those documentations sufficient for the American Land Title Form?
6. Is utility outreach documentation required during the application process or only post award?
Answer
Submitted: Thursday 18-JUN-2026 08:20 AM
1. The Proposal Guaranty shall be submitted through Bid Express with the Proposer's Price Proposal. A single Proposal Guaranty is required by each Proposer and shall be in an amount equal to ten percent (10%) of the aggregate price proposed in Proposer’s Price Proposal for all Sites included in the Proposer's submission. A separate Proposal Guaranty is not required for each Site.
2.MDT will accept the letter of bonding capacity submitted with the proposer’s SOQ, provided it is notarized and identifies the proposer's available bonding capacity. This requirement is separate from the Proposal Guaranty. In addition to the notarized letter of bonding capacity, each Proposer shall submit a Proposal Guaranty in an amount equal to ten percent (10%) of the Proposer's submitted Contract Price, which secures the Proposer's proposal in accordance with the solicitation requirements.
3.The NEPA document for the project is Appendix 1 Form 1C [Categorical Exclusion (CE) Documentation]. Appendix 1 Forms 1A (Biological Resources Report) and 1B (Initial Site Assessment) provide the supporting information for the findings and conclusions documented in Form 1C. Forms 1A, 1B, and 1C are all required and all need to be completed in their entirety.
Appendix 1 Form 1D (Aquatic Resources Technical Memo) is not a NEPA document. This form is provided for use by the Proposer if the Proposer identifies that there are wetlands or waters on or adjacent to the project. This form only needs to be completed in its entirety if there are aquatic resources on or adjacent to the project.
For these forms the project info is as follows:
Project Name: NEVI PROGRAM-INTERSTATE SYSTEM
Project Number: EV STWD(983)
Control Number: 10436000
Sending these forms to a specific consultant is not a requirement. However, the person who fills the Environmental Compliance Lead position on a proposer’s team must meet the requirements of section 4.2.9 Environmental Compliance Lead of the RFP.
4.For Appendix 1 Form 1B, the UPN is the same as the Control Number. The design lead would be the individual leading the design efforts at the Design Firm (identified in the Proposers SOQ). There is no requirement to include attachments or photos; the Proposer determines if these are needed.
5.The American Land Title Association (ALTA) form(s) used should verify that the person identified in question B1 is the legal owner of the property where the proposed EV station will be installed. Evidence should also be provided that the utility easements necessary to provide electricity to the EV charging station are in place whether that is an ALTA form or correspondence with a utility is left up to the Proposer.
6.No specific utility documentation is required during the proposal process.
302 - GREYCLIFF AREA BRIDGES - September 09, 2026
Notifications
-1-
Submitted: Wednesday 29-APR-2026 09:24 AM
The Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) is soliciting design and construction services for the Design-Build project identified below. Contractor and consultant teams (Firms) are encouraged to submit a Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) response electronically by 11:00 a.m., local time on May 27, 2026.
Project Name: GREYCLIFF AREA BRIDGES
Project No: STPB 81014(2)0
Control No: 10661000
Project Description:
The scope of work for this Design-Build Contract includes services required to design and reconstruct six (6) existing bridges along Highway 10 between Greycliff and Big Timber, Montana. The Project involves replacing the aging and deteriorating bridges with new structures and will reconstruct the adjacent roadways as necessary.
The project RFQ and attachments can be found at the following link: RFQ AND ATTACHMENTS
-2-
Submitted: Wednesday 24-JUN-2026 12:58 PM
Short-listed Firms (in alphabetical order)
Battle Ridge Builders and Forsgren
Frontier West and Morrison-Maierle
Jackson Contractor Group and Interstate Engineering
Amendments
No Amendments available for this project.
Clarifications
-1-
Submitted: Monday 11-MAY-2026 02:55 PM
Addition to Section 1., paragraph 2 of the RFQ: When the system prompts the user to enter a delivery email, complete the following steps to submit the SOQ to mdtalternativecontracting@mt.gov: Select the “Find a State Group” tab, type “MDT Alternative Contracting” in the search bar, click the “Search” button, click the “+MDT Alternative Contracting” button after the search has completed, click the “Send” button.
Questions
-1-
Submitted: Friday 08-MAY-2026 02:39 PM
Company: Morrison-Maierle
Contact: Luke Carlson
Can the table that defines which Phase 1 Documents are Bridging Documents and which are provided for informational purposes only be provided now, so firms can assess the required design effort, the relative value of the stipend, and the ability to meet the project completion date?
Answer
Submitted: Tuesday 12-MAY-2026 03:41PM
The table that defines which Phase 1 Documents are Bridging Documents is being developed and not available. The following is a preliminary list of Bridging Documents that will be provided with the RFP: Preliminary Geotechnical Field Investigation Report, Categorical Exclusion, Scope of Work Report, SHARES Reports and Hydraulic Models, Control Survey, Cadastral Survey, Engineering Survey, and Structure Type, Size and Location Report. The contractual Bridging Documents will be identified and provided with the RFP and will supersede the preliminary list provided within this response.
-2-
Submitted: Friday 08-MAY-2026 02:36 PM
Company: Morrison-Maierle
Contact: Luke Carlson
Will MDT entertain Alternative Technical Concepts to allow teams to best meet MDT design requirements and project goals?
Answer
Submitted: Tuesday 12-MAY-2026 03:55PM
Alternative Technical Concepts are not allowed on this project. Proposed deviations from the Contract requirements must be submitted as questions through the Q&A Forum.
-3-
Submitted: Friday 08-MAY-2026 03:41 PM
Company: Frontier West LLC
Contact: Kris Anderson
Would MDT consider extending the duration between the release of the RFP and the technical proposal due date timeline if the Phase 1 work does not include roadway or bridge design or plans?
Answer
Submitted: Tuesday 12-MAY-2026 04:02PM
The Phase 1 Documents will include a preliminary road plan and profile sheet for each site. The associated electronic CAD files will be provided with the Phase 1 Documents attached to the RFP. The draft RFP requires the Firm to only submit a road plan and profile sheet for each site with the Technical Proposal. The Tentative Schedule of Events within the RFQ is unchanged.
-4-
Submitted: Friday 08-MAY-2026 03:41 PM
Company: Frontier West LLC
Contact: Kris Anderson
The preliminary drawings provided with the RFQ do not appear to provide any bridge or roadway design information. Will MDT increase the stipend if the Phase 1 work does not include roadway and bridge plans and design?
Answer
Submitted: Tuesday 12-MAY-2026 04:05PM
The Phase 1 Documents will include a preliminary road plan and profile sheet for each site and the associated electronic CAD files. The stipend will not be increased.
-5-
Submitted: Friday 15-MAY-2026 12:01 PM
Company: Forsgren Associates
Contact: Nathan Haddick
Section VI. A. 1. g. of the RFQ states: "The prime contractor, design professional, and key personnel (including the individual’s employer) are exclusive to the Firm and cannot team with another Firm to submit more than one SOQ per Project." Does this restriction preclude a subconsultant or subcontractor from being included on multiple teams submitting SOQ's for this project if they are not listed as Key Personnel?
Answer
Submitted: Wednesday 20-MAY-2026 08:25 AM
Individuals assigned as Key Personnel and their employer are exclusive to the Firm and cannot be associated with multiple Firms. All other companies, besides those assigned with Key Personnel, may team with multiple Firms.
-6-
Submitted: Friday 19-JUN-2026 10:29 AM
Company: Morrison-Maierle
Contact: Luke Carlson
The response to Question 1 in the Q&A states that the Scope of Work Report will be provided. However, we were unable to locate this report in the provided RFP materials. Please guide us on where to find the report or provide it.
Answer
Submitted: Friday 26-JUN-2026 10:48 AM
The response to Question #1 provided a preliminary list of Bridging Documents which included the Scope of Work Report for the Project. The Scope of Work Report was reviewed by MDT and does not provide any additional design or construction requirements due to the limited design; therefore, it will not be provided to the short-listed Firms.
-7-
Submitted: Friday 19-JUN-2026 02:23 PM
Company: Frontier West LLC
Contact: Kris Anderson
The response to Question 3 states that the plan and profile sheets for each site will be provided with the Phase 1 documents. We are unable to locate the plan and profile sheets in the provided RFP materials. Please provide the plan and profile sheets or let us know where we can find this data within the material provided.
Answer
Submitted: Friday 26-JUN-2026 10:50 AM
The plan and profile sheets for each site are included in pdf format as the last page(s) of the SHARES Reports. The corresponding CAD files can be found within the following OneDrive folder path: 10661 Greycliff Area Bridges – RFP and Attachments > Attachments > F-Phase 1 Documents > HY > 10661000HYEXZ01.zip.
303 - MILL CREEK HIGHWAY - September 22, 2026
Notifications
-1-
Submitted: Wednesday 15-APR-2026 11:36AM
The Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) is soliciting design and construction services for the Design-Build project identified below. Contractor and consultant teams (Firms) are encouraged to submit a Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) response electronically by 11:00 a.m., local time on May 13, 2026.
Project Name: MILL CREEK HIGHWAY
Project No: SSS 569-1(11)6
Control No: 10473000
Project Description:
The scope of work for this Design-Build contract includes reconstruction of approximately five miles of Secondary Highway 569 (S-569), also known as Mill Creek Highway, from reference post (RP) 6.11 to RP 11.0. The project is funded by a RAISE grant awarded to Anaconda-Deer Lodge County (ADLC). The project is intended to address existing deficiencies and improve safety. The roadway will be reconstructed to include 12-foot driving lanes and 1-foot shoulders. Additionally, the project will improve roadway geometrics and reconstruct the existing pavement with new bituminous surfacing. The project will also include new centerline rumble strips, pavement markings, signage, guardrail, improved clear zones and side slopes, and improved hydraulics, culvert and storm water infrastructure.
The project RFQ and attachments can be found at the following link: RFQ AND ATTACHMENTS
-2-
Submitted: Monday 01-JUN-2026 07:06 AM
Short-listed Firms (in alphabetical order)
- Montana Materials & Construction and KLJ Engineering
- Riverside Contracting and Morrison-Maierle
- Schellinger Construction and DJ&A
Amendments
No Amendments available for this project.
Clarifications
-1-
Submitted: Thursday 07-MAY-2026 01:26 PM
Modification to Section I., paragraph 2 of the RFQ: When submitting SOQ through the File Transfer Service, submit the SOQ to the following email addresses: ayerger@mt.gov and bgraff@mt.gov. Do not submit SOQ to mdtalternativecontracting@mt.gov
-2-
Submitted: Tuesday 07-JULY-2026 08:51AM
Fill the existing cut section of the proposed abandoned highway between Stations 328+00 RT and 333+00 RT in accordance with section 203 of the MDT standard specifications. Construct a natural, gradual slope from the top of the existing cut section to an area east of the existing pavement shoulder. Do not cause additional impacts to aquatic resources, including Wetland areas, that were not already accounted for in the Phase 1 Design. Salvage topsoil from other locations on the project and revegetate in accordance with section 610 of the MDT standard specifications and the special provisions.
Questions
-1-
Submitted: Monday 08-JUN-2026 11:00 AM
Company: Morrison-Maierle
Contact: Bryan Vanderloos
Can MDT confirm the guardrail type for the project? The RFP calls out Box-Beam, but the Phase 1 plans show MGS guardrail.
Answer
Submitted: Thursday 11-JUN-2026 07:10 AM
Provide Box Beam Guardrail in accordance with the RFP.